26 July - 11 August 2021

Hisham Tipu Apa Hari Ini

I made some graphs. There is only 2.5 weeks of data, which is very little. But even so, we can see a trend. One that Hisham tried to cover up by changing the criteria halfway. What is he trying to hide???

* * *
Saya buat beberapa graf. Data ada 2.5 minggu saja, sikit sangat, namun cukup untuk nampak trend. Trend yang kurang cantik yang Hisham cuba tutup dengan menukar kriteria tengah jalan. Apa yang dia cuba sembunyikan? 

Sources:
FB KKM, Hisham
FB JKJAV
https://github.com/MoH-Malaysia/covid19-public

Look carefully at the dates. We will come back to the dates again at the end.

11 August - “No history of vaccination”
12 August - “Not completely vaccinated”

* * *
Lihat dengan teliti tarikh2 ini. Kita akan tengok lagi penipuan Hisham pada hujung post ini.

11 Ogos - “Tiada sejarah vaksinasi”
12 Ogos - “Tidak lengkap vaksinasi”

After 2.5 weeks of data with “Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated”, Hisham changed the data to “Fully vaccinated”, which means not just 2 shots, but 2 weeks after the second shot. So, people who have had 2 shots but it has been less than 2 weeks are still counted as “Not fully vaccinated.”

* * *
Selepas 2.5 minggu mengeluarkan carta yg menunjukkan “Sudah divaksin/Tidak divaksin”, tiba2 Hisham tukar kriteria jadi “Lengkap divaksin/Tidak lengkap divaksin”. Kalau sekali pandang memang nampak carta ini macam yg tidak divaksin, tapi "Lengkap divaksin” bermaksud cucuk 2 kali dan lepas 2 minggu. Mereka yang telah cucuk 2 kali tapi belum sampai 2 minggu masih dikira sebagai "Tidak lengkap divaksin.”

I made this simple representation. On the left (Hisham's graph), out of every 10 patients, 1 person is fully vaccinated and the other 9 are not. Most people look at Hisham's chart and go, "Aargh!!! 90% of infected people are not vaccinated!!!  Faster go and get jabbed before you dieeee!!!"

But did you see the fine print? The “unvaccinated” group actually includes patients with 2 shots less than 2 weeks, people with 1 shot, and people who have had no shots, including children and babies.

Now, let's look at the middle bar. This was the population 2 weeks ago. Out of 10 people, 6 are unvaccinated. 2 people have received 1 or 2 doses <2 weeks (orange), and 2 people have received 2 doses >2 weeks ago (red).

On the right is the actual percentage among patients. This is the last day that this data was available (11 August 2021). Out of 10 patients, 1 is fully vaccinated (as appears on Hisham’s chart). However, another 1.5 have received one vaccine or two (orange). So actually, out of 10 patients, 2.5 have already been vaccinated.

By changing the criteria, Hisham has wiped out the orange section to make it look like 90% are unvaccinated.

* * *

Saya buat carta yg ringkas ni. Di sebelah kiri (ikut carta Hisham), daripada 10 pesakit, 1 orang sudah lengkap divaksin dan lagi 9 tidak. Kebanyakan orang tengok carta Hisham dan terus panik, “90% pesakit tidak divaksin!!!  Cepat pergi cucuk sebelum mati!!!”

Tapi adakah kamu tengok betul2? Kumpulan “Tidak divaksin” sebenarnya termasuk pesakit yg sudah cucuk 2 kali tapi kurang daripada 2 minggu, pesakit yg telah cucuk 1 kali dan orang yg tidak cucuk (termasuk kanak2 dan bayi).

Sekarang, lihat bar yg di tengah. Ini adalah status rakyat 2 minggu yg lalu. Daripada setiap 10 orang, 6 tidak divaksin. 2 orang telah cucuk 1 atau 2 dos tapi tak sampai 2 minggu (oren), dan 2 orang telah cucuk 2 dos >2 minggu (merah).

Di sebelah kanan ialah peratusan sebenar di kalangan pesakit. Ini adalah hari terakhir data ini diberi (11 Ogos 2021). Daripada 10 orang pesakit, 1 orang telah lengkap divaksin (seperti carta Hisham). Akan tetapi, lagi 1.5 orang telah menerima 1 atau 2 dos (oren). Jadi, sebenarnya, daripada 10 orang pesakit, 2.5 orang telah divaksin.

Dengan mengubah kriteria, Hisham telah menghapuskan bahagian oren itu supaya data nampak macam 90% tidak divaksin.

Looking at the general population (middle bar), out of the 6 people who are not vaccinated, 3 (or 50%) are children, who could not be vaccinated at this time.

Looking at the patients (right), only 1 out of 10 are children. Perhaps they don't go school or go out as much as adults, and thus don't get infected as much.

Among the population (middle bar), 6 out of 10 people are not vaccinated, but among the patients (right), 7.5 are unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are over-represented among patients. This means vaccines do give some protection, although not much. From 40% in the middle bar (orange and red part) to 25% in the right bar, is a reduction of 40%. Certainly not the 90% that you would think if you looked at Hisham's chart. Did you fall for his spin?

(Source:
https://codeblue.galencentre.org/.../covid-19-deaths.../)

* * *

Di dalam bar di tengah (rakyat), daripada 6 orang yg tidak divaksin, 3 (atau 50%) adalah kanak2, yg tidak boleh divaksin pada masa ini.

Di dalam bar di sebelah kanan (pesakit), hanya 1 daripada 10 adalah kanak2. Mungkin mereka tidak pergi ke sekolah atau banyak keluar macam orang dewasa, sebab itu kurang terjangkit.

Di kalangan rakyat (tengah), 6 daripada 10 orang tidak divaksin. Tetapi di kalangan pesakit (kanan), 7.5 orang tidak divaksin. Ini menunjukkan vaksin ada memberi sedikit perlindungan, tetapi tidak banyak. Bahagian oren dan merah turun dari 40% ke 25%, iaitu penurunan risiko sebanyak 40%; bukan 90% seperti yg dipaparkan di dalam carta Hisham. Pandai putar noh... Adakah kamu tertipu? Ramai saja yg tertipu.

Over 2.5 weeks, the number of vaccinated patients did not go down but went up instead.

* * *
Di dalam masa 2.5 minggu, bilangan pesakit yg telah divaksin tidak turun tetapi semakin naik.

.

The vaccinated make up more and more of the infected. In just 2 weeks, the percentage increased 3-fold.

* * *
Di dalam masa hanya 2 minggu, peratus pesakit yg telah divaksin naik 3 kali ganda.
.

Is this because the number of vaccinated people has increased among the population? But if vaccines worked, the red bars should go down, no? They keep saying that when we have achieved full vaccination, cases will go down and we can open, and that cases are going up because people are still unvaccinated. Which one is going up, the purple or the red?

* * *
Adakah ini disebabkan peratus rakyat yg telah divaksin pun semakin naik? Tetapi kalau vaksin boleh melindungi, sepatutnya bahagian merah itu turun, bukan? Mereka selalu kata bila rakyat sudah lengkap divaksin, kes akan turun dan semua boleh buka semula, dan kes masih naik sebab orang yg tidak divaksin kena jangkit. Tengok sendiri bahagian mana yg naik, yg ungu atau yg merah?

The percentage of vaccinated people (green) increased from 24.8% to 39.3%, which is an increase of 58%.

The percentage of people who have got 2 doses (red) went up from 11.3% to 18.7%, an increase of 65%.

* * *
Peratus rakyat yg telah divaksin (hijau) naik dari 24.8% ke 39.3%, iaitu kenaikan sebanyak 58%.

Peratus rakyat yg telah divaksin dua kali (merah) naik dari 11.3% ke 18.7%, iaitu kenaikan sebanyak 65%.

This is the number of patients who have been vaccinated, as a proportion of the actual number of people in the country who have been vaccinated.

On the first day in the chart, 15 out of every 100,000 vaccinated people got infected. On 5 August, 43/100,000 vaccinated people got infected. This is an increase of 2.8 times – almost triple! On the last day in the chart, 40/100,000 – an increase of 2.6 times in just 2.5 weeks.

* * *
Ini adalah bilangan pesakit yg telah divaksin sebagai sebahagian daripada bilangan rakyat yg telah divaksin. Pada hari pertama, 15 daripada setiap 100,000 rakyat yg telah divaksin dijangkiti. Pada 5 Ogos, 43/100,000 orang dijangkiti. Ini merupakan kenaikan 2.8 kali ganda! Pada hari terakhir di dalam carta ini – 40/100,000 – kenaikan 2.6 kali ganda di dalam masa 2.5 minggu.

Now let’s look at the unvaccinated. On the first day, 54 out of every 100,000 unvaccinated people got infected. On the last day in the chart, 79/100,000 people got infected. That’s an increase of 1.45 times. The increase among the vaccinated (2.8x) is double this!

Infections increased for both groups, but the vaccinated got infected at double the rate of the unvaccinated!

* * *
Sekarang, jom tengok kumpulan yg tidak divaksin. Pada hari pertama, 54 daripada setiap 100,000 rakyat yg tidak divaksin telah dijangkiti. Pada hari terakhir di dalam carta ini, 79/100,000 orang dijangkiti. Ini merupakan kenaikan 1.45 kali ganda. Kadar kenaikan di kalangan orang yg telah divaksin adalah 2 kali ganda ini.

Maksudnya, kadar jangkitan bagi semua orang naik, tapi kadar jangkitan di kalangan orang yg telah divaksin naik 2 kali ganda orang yg tidak divaksin!

Now, putting both graphs together, we can see that the unvaccinated (blue) get infected at a much higher rate than the vaccinated (red). It is consistent every day in this chart, so it is not a coincidence and we can say that vaccines indeed do give some protection.

How much protection? Let’s look at the first day. The infection rate for the unvaccinated is 54.1 per 100,000, whereas the infection rate for the vaccinated is 15.2 per 100,000. This is a reduction of risk by 72% for the vaccinated. This is the efficacy rate of the vaccine.

The blue bars are going up, but the red bars are going up twice as steeply. Why do vaccinated people increasingly make up a larger proportion of the sick, at double the rate of the unvaccinated? Are the vaccines not effective against new strains? Has immunity waned? If vaccines are not effective or antibodies have waned, we would soon see vaccinated people getting sick at the same rate as the unvaccinated.

Or could this be the Antibody-Dependent Enhancement that scientists had warned about? ADE means vaccine-induced antibodies make the disease worse if you catch the virus than if you had never been vaccinated.

In making the vaccine for SARS, all the rats who were vaccinated and then infected developed lung lesions (visible damage), but those who were unvaccinated and then infected did not have any lung lesions (meaning milder disease). This was why the SARS vaccine failed - because antibodies to the vaccine made the disease worse when the rats caught the virus. How different is SARS 1 and 2? Not much! Is this why cases started going up all around the world after vaccination started?

"Non-neutralizing antibodies generated by past infection or vaccination fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure. [Antibodies to vaccines are not strong enough to eliminate the virus.] Instead, they act as a gateway by allowing the virus to gain entry and replicate in cells that are usually off-limits. [Antibodies help viruses get into cells.]”

(Source: https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00392-3/fulltext)

* * *
Sekarang kita lihat kedua2 graf tadi sekali. Orang yg tidak divaksin (biru) dijangkiti pada kadar yg lebih tinggi daripada orang yg divaksin (merah). Ini sama setiap sehari, jadi kita boleh katakan vaksin memberi perlindungan.

Berapa banyak perlindungan? Lihat data hari pertama. Kadar jangkitan untuk orang yg tidak divaksin adalah 54.1 untuk setiap 100,000 orang, manakala kadar jangkitan untuk orang yg divaksin adalah 15.2. Perbezaan di sini ialah pengurangan risiko sebanyak 72%. Ini adalah kadar keberkesanan vaksin.

Bar biru naik, tapi bar merah naik 2x ganda! Kenapa bilangan pesakit yg telah divaksin bertambah lebih laju daripada pesakit yg tidak dicucuk? Adakah vaksin tidak boleh melawan varian baru? Atau antibodi sudah berkurangan? Jikalau begitu, kadar jangkitan akan jadi sama dengan yg tidak divaksin tak lama lagi

Atau adakah telah terjadi Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)? Saintis telah lama memberi amaran bahawa vaksin ini boleh menyebabkan ADE. Apabila vaksin untuk SARS dihasilkan, tikus yg dvaksin dan kemudian dijangkiti dengan virus SARS menjadi sakit teruk dan rosak paru2nya. Tikus yg tidak divaksin dan dijangkiti virus juga sakit tapi tidak ada kerosakan paru2 (maksudnya penyakit lebih ringan). Ini disebabkan antibodi yg dihasilkan selepas mencucuk vaksin tidak cukup kuat untuk membunuh semua virus, dan jika dijangkiti virus yg sebenar, antibodi menolong virus masuk ke dalam sel.

(Source: https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00392-3/fulltext)

Vaksin ini gagal, sebab tu tak ada vaksin untuk SARS. Apa beza virus SARS 1 dan 2? Tak banyak beza... Adakah ini sebab kes Covid naik merata dunia selepas mula cucuk?

This is the efficacy rate of vaccines over the 2.5 weeks. Vaccines gave protection from 35% to 72%, with an average of 50%. This is certainly far from the 95% that the manufacturer claims, or the 90% that Hisham would like us to believe.

* * *
Ini adalah kadar keberkesanan vaksin selama 2.5 minggu ini. Vaksin memberi perlindungan sebanyak 36% - 72%, dengan purata 50%. Ini jauh lebih rendah daripada 95% yg diiklankan oleh penjual atau 90% yg dinyatakan oleh Hisham.

Is the news so bad that Hisham had to cover it up? On 12 August 2021, he changed the criteria and now only 2 doses >2 weeks are considered fully vaccinated, and everyone else is unvaccinated.

Let’s look at the infection rate among the fully vaccinated. Their antibodies should be good enough now! Full power! But… the infection rate is 40 to 62 people out of 100,000 fully vaxed people. That is a lot higher than the 1 and 2 dose group before Hisham changed the criteria!

So, the more doses of vaccines people get, the more likely they are to get sick. If this keeps up, will the rate become the same as the unvaccinated or even worse?

(I will be updating this graph as we go along. Follow me if you want to see updates.)

* * *
Adakah berita begitu buruk, sebab itu Hisham menutupnya? Pada 12 Ogos 2021, Hisham tukar kriteria. Sekarang, hanya 2 dos >2 minggu dikira sebagai lengkap divaksin, dan yg lain semua dikira sebagai tidak divaksin.

Jom lihat kadar jangkitan di kalangan orang yg telah lengkap vaksin. Antibodi pun sudah cukup padu! Tapi… kadar jangkitan adalah 42 hingga 60 orang daripada 100,000. Ini adalah lebih tinggi daripada kumpulan yg divaksin (1 atau 2 dos) sebelum Hisham tukar kriteria!

Jadi, nampaknya lagi banyak vaksin, lagi sakit. Kalau ini berterusan, adakan kadarnya akan jadi sama macam orang yg tidak divaksin, atau lebih teruk lagi?

(Saya akan update graf ini mengikut data baru. Follow saya jika nak ikuti update.)

I put these 3 graphs together side-by-side. They are not really comparable because the purple one has a different date from the other two. But you can see that the double-jabbed have more disease than the single jab, but overall, vaccines still give some protection than none at all.

* * *
Saya bubuh 3 carta ini sekali supaya senang dibanding. Sebenarnya, graf2 ini tidak boleh dibanding sebab yg ungu bukan dari tarikh yg sama. Kita boleh nampak bahawa orang yg dicucuk 2 kali lebih ramai yg sakit daripada yg terima 1 atau 2 dos vaksin. Tetapi vaksin masih boleh memberi sedikit perlindungan.

Is this why cases increased 6-fold in just 5.5 months?
(Feb 24, 2021 - vaccination started.)

***
Adakah ini sebab kes kita naik 6 kali ganda di dalam masa 5.5. bulan?
(Feb 24, 2021 - start cucuk.)

Source:
https://newslab.malaysiakini.com/covid-19/en

97% vaccinated. I have collected some interesting numbers from Kuching. Will be posting them soon.

* * *
97% telah divaksin. Saya terjumpa angka yg menarik dari Kuching. Nanti saya post.

So, is it true that if you are vaccinated and still get Covid, your disease will be milder? By many people's accounts, 80% of patients in hospitals are vaccinated. In comparison, only 40% of the population are vaccinated.

* * *
Jadi, adakah benar kalau kamu telah divaksin dan masih kena Covid, penyakit kamu akan jadi lebih ringan? Ramai yg kata di antara pesakit di dalam hospital, 80% telah divaksin, tapi rakyat hanya 40% divaksin.

What else did Hisham lie about?

At the beginning, I said look carefully at the dates. Now they have changed it again.

11 August - Unvaccinated
12 August - Not fully vaccinated
13 August - Not fully vaccinated
14 August - Unvaccinated
15 August - Unvaccinated
16 August - Unvaccinated

The 11th was the last day of "Vaccinated/Unvaccinated". On the 12th, Hisham changed the criteria to "Not fully vaccinated". Look at the numbers for Stage 2 and 3 (blue underlines). "Unvaccinated" is about 65%. "Not fully vaccinated" is about 88%.

On 14th August (bottom row), the chart changed colour (new phase?) and the words changed to "Unvaccinated" again. Did they change back to the old data too?

Look at Stage 2 and 3. The numbers are still about 88%. They are actually patients who are "Not fully vaccinated", but have now been relabeled as UNVACCINATED.

Hisham is a damned liar and fearmonger!!! How dare he lie to the people who pay his salary!!! He should be fired!!!!

* * *
Apa Hisham tipu lagi hari ini???

Pada permulaan post ini, saya kata lihat dengan teliti tarikh apabila kriteria diubah. Sekarang ia telah diubah lagi sekali.

11 August - Tiada sejarah vaksinasi
12 August - TIDAK LENGKAP vaksinasi
13 August - TIDAK LENGKAP vaksinasi
14 August - Tiada sejarah vaksinasi
15 August - Tiada sejarah vaksinasi
16 August - Tiada sejarah vaksinasi

11hb adalah hari terakhir ada data "Sudah divaksin/Tidak divaksin". Pada 12hb, Hisham tukar kriteria dari “Tiada sejarah vaksinasi” kepada “Tidak lengkap vaksinasi”. Lihat angka untuk Kategori 2 dan 3 (garisan biru). Tidak divaksin adalah ~65%. Tidak lengkap vaksin adalah ~88%.

Pada 14hb (barisan bawah), carta bertukar warna (fasa baru?) dan perkataan ditukar kepada “Tiada sejarah vaksinasi”. Adakah mereka tukar balik kepada data lama?

Lihat Kategori 2 dan 3. Angka tetap lebih kurang 88%. Ini adalah pesakit yang tidak lengkap vaksin dan mereka telah ditukar menjadi TIDAK DIVAKSIN.

Hisham adalah seorang penipu dan fearmonger!!! Berani dia menipu orang yg membayar gaji dia!!!! Dia patut dibuang kerja!!!!!

This is how Hisham’s lies affect people. These two girls died one week after their 2nd jab of Sino. I bet they went to a huge gathering and got infected at the Pusat Penjangkitan Virus (PPV), that was why they were both sick and died on the same day. But they died only 6 days after their 2nd jab. Now they will no longer be acknowledged as having died after being fully vaccinated, but are counted as UNVACCINATED. This is how Hisham uses people’s deaths to manipulate the numbers to blame the unvaccinated, so that he can keep his crap looking good. LIES!!!!!

* * *
Ini adalah kesan penipuan Hisham. Dua orang gadis ini meninggal 6 hari selepas cucuk ke-2. Saya pasti mereka menyertai perhimpunan besar di Pusat Penjangkitan Virus (PPV) and dijangkiti di sana. Sebab itu, mereka berdua sakit dan meninggal pada hari yg sama. Tapi mereka meninggal seminggu selepas dos ke-2. Sekarang, mereka tidak akan tergolong di dalam kumpulan yg lengkap divaksin, tetapi dikira sebagai TIDAK DIVAKSIN. Macam ni lah Hisham gunakan kematian mangsa untuk putar dan salahkan golongan yg tidak divaksin supaya vaksin sendiri kelihatan suciiii.

Hisham lies again!!!

17 August 2021 - 4 deaths out of 13,073!  (This number is wrong because it's 13,075.) This is the total from the beginning until now. But vaccinations only started on 24 Feb 2021.

Deaths:
Start - 23 February 2021: 1,074
24 Feb - 17 August 2021: 11,999

But he used the grand total, inluding before there were vaccines, to make the death percentage smaller. This is how he lies. It makes a mockery of the dead. And only 4 deaths after 2 weeks? Laughable. I have seen more than that just on socmed. Check it out yourself:

http://T.ME/AEFICOVIDVAX

* * *
Hisham tipu lagi!!!

17 Ogos 2021 - 4 kematian daripada 13,073!  (Nombor ini salah sebab sepatutnya 13,075.) Ini adalah jumlah kematian dari mula sampai sekarang. Tetapi vaksinasi hanya bermula pada 24 Feb 2021.

Bilangan kematian:
Mula - 23 Februari 2021: 1,074
24 Februari - 17 Ogos 2021: 11,999

Tetapi dia guna jumlah semua, termasuk sebelum ada vaksin, supaya peratusan kematian nampak lagi kecil. Macam tu dia putar. Dan hanya 4 kematian? LOL. Di media sosial pun dah lebih daripada itu. Lihat sendiri:

http://T.ME/AEFICOVIDVAX

Source:
https://github.com/MoH-Malaysia/covid19-public
.

* * * * *

Go to Homepage.

Follow me on:  Facebook  *  MeWe  *  Telegram